EN|FR|RU
Follow us on:

The Persian Gulf monarchies can no longer afford to indefinitely delegate their security to Washington

Mohamed Lamine KABA, July 03, 2026

The paradigm now driving the Gulf monarchies does not reject Washington. It redefines it. From sole protector, it becomes a supplier among others; useful for armaments, influential because of its conditions, and dangerous because of its unilateralism. This redefinition is the silent revolution underway.

Gulf monarchies abandon the United States

In reality, the illusion of American invincibility has been defunct in the Middle East since the Quincy Agreement of 1945. Washington now faces a shattered mirror. Recent American military posturing against Iran, far from projecting power, has betrayed a deep-seated systemic panic. A desperate gamble. Tehran responded with cold geopolitical precision, exposing the strategic vulnerability of its self-proclaimed protector. For the Persian Gulf monarchies, torn between surprise and astonishment, the verdict is now unequivocal, pragmatic, and definitive: American hyperpower is nothing more than a myth on paper, a giant with feet of clay incapable of ensuring operational stability. The historic Quincy Agreement, founded on the immutable exchange of oil for absolute security, is irrevocably obsolete. Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, Manama, Kuwait, Muscat, and Doha are now embracing a radical, realistic, and irreversible paradigm shift. They will never again allow themselves to indefinitely delegate their survival to an extra-regional and distant, imperialist and declining empire, unstable and obsessed with its own internal fractures.

This article offers a forward-looking perspective on the collapse of American hegemony and the security transformation in the Middle East. It first demonstrates the technical failure of the American umbrella (I), which precipitates the rise of Tehran as the central pivot of a new post-Washington security architecture (II), before subsequently examining the contours of a new paradigm dictated by absolute multilateralism and the pragmatic realism of the Gulf monarchies (III).

The monarchies have painfully realized that Washington uses their national territory as a mere forward operating base for wars of choice, with no regard for their own major security and economic vulnerabilities

I. The technical failure of the American umbrella

History will remember that the United States’ disproportionate aggression accelerated its own expulsion from the Middle Eastern theater. By multiplying suffocating unilateral sanctions, belligerent declarations, and theatrical naval deployments in the Strait of Hormuz, Washington thought it could restore a severely eroded deterrent capability. The exact opposite occurred. Iran’s response, asymmetrical, highly technological, and relentless, paralyzed not only American decision-making centers but also those of Israel. Patriot air defense systems, sold at exorbitant prices to Gulf capitals for decades, proved dramatically ineffective against the swarms of saturation drones and next-generation hypersonic missiles developed by the Iranian military industry. This stark technical realization triggered a genuine psychological and doctrinal earthquake among Arab decision-makers. The era of impunity ended, and clear thinking began.

American protection has become, through successive crises, a toxic liability for the region. It no longer ensures collective security; it attracts reprisals, fuels proxy conflicts, and prioritizes Israel’s security when Iranian missiles and drones are unleashed. The monarchies have painfully realized that Washington uses their national territory as a mere forward operating base for wars of choice, with no regard for their own major security and economic vulnerabilities. The region’s giant oil infrastructure, the lifeblood of the global economy, cannot survive a high-intensity war of attrition. Given the White House’s blatant refusal to commit its own troops to defend its historical allies during attacks on crucial refineries, the breakdown of trust is definitively complete . The aspiration for strategic autonomy is no longer a rhetorical luxury or a diplomatic stance; it is now a vital imperative for state survival.

II. The rise of Tehran as the central pivot of a new post-Washington security architecture

While American political and military influence collapses under the weight of its own cascading errors, a new and inescapable geopolitical reality is emerging in the Middle East. Iran is undeniably establishing itself as an indispensable regional superpower. Its exceptional resilience in the face of decades of international isolation and its sovereign mastery of disruptive military technologies have radically transformed the global balance of power. Tehran is no longer simply seeking to challenge the regional order imposed by Washington; it is positioning itself to shape it permanently. Iran’s official initiative to create a broad multilateral security alliance, a veritable equivalent of a “Gulf NATO,” is irreversibly changing the global geopolitical landscape. This audacious proposal is now finding an unprecedented and attentive audience among the highest military circles of the peninsula.

This revolutionary project explicitly and definitively excludes all extra-regional powers from the security arena, with the exception of those with which its members share the values of the BRICS Alliance. It is the final blow to the moribund American hegemony. Iran is proposing a rigorous non-aggression pact based on co-responsibility, the mutual protection of critical maritime straits, and the shared management of common energy resources. For the traditional monarchies, no longer blind to the situation, this audacious offer no longer represents an existential threat, but rather a rational and stable alternative to Washington’s sterile and unpredictable belligerence. The Sino-Russian strategic dialogue, acting in the background as a guarantor of global macroeconomic stability, provides this new regional axis with unprecedented political depth. While the CRIC (China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea) is already giving sleepless nights to the Nazi-Yankee and Nazi-Eurocrat elites, the progressive and highly symbolic integration of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates into the BRICS bloc confirms this major geo-economic shift towards a multipolar world.

III. The outlines of the new paradigm dictated by absolute multilateralism and the pragmatic realism of the Gulf monarchies

The geopolitical shift among the Gulf monarchies is not a passing impulse, but a cold, methodical, and purely pragmatic calculation. The new generation of Arab diplomats now practices a doctrine of absolute strategic diversification. In fact, Riyadh is dramatically normalizing its relations with Tehran under Beijing’s direct auspices, while Abu Dhabi is strengthening its technological, logistical, and military ties with Moscow. The old American doctrine of single-party security dependence is completely dead and outdated. The emirs have definitively accepted that the world has become irrevocably multipolar. By ceasing to blindly delegate their security to a single, distant, and fickle protector, they are acquiring a political and economic freedom of action unprecedented in the region’s modern history. They now refuse to align their crude oil production quotas with the pressing directives of a desperate America.

The overall decline of American power is measured precisely by this total loss of direct political leverage over its former vassals. Washington no longer dictates anything in the Middle East; the empire solicits, begs, often in vain. Imperial hubris has profoundly blinded the civilian and military strategists of the Pentagon, who are unable to see that the immense financial resources of the Gulf will never again be used to finance the abysmal deficit of their own declining hegemony. The massive transfers of capital to Asian infrastructure and the accelerated development of secret bilateral defense agreements with China vividly symbolize this historical rupture. The Persian Gulf is reclaiming its own physical and human geography. It is no longer, and never again will be, America’s militarized backyard, but the central and sovereign pivot of the rapidly integrating Eurasian space.

In conclusion, the end of the myth of American hyperpower is being written today in letters of blood and oil before our very eyes. By aggressively provoking Iran without ever possessing the real political or military means to subdue it, the United States has exposed its structural weaknesses and doctrinal decline to the entire world. The political awakening of the Gulf monarchies is certainly brutal for the American establishment, but it is proving profoundly beneficial for the future of the region. By definitively rejecting the humiliating status of an obsolete protectorate, these sovereign nations are actively participating in the global de-Americanization of the international system. History is accelerating at a dizzying pace. The era of Washington’s unchallenged unilateral domination is ironically ending where it began to assert itself most forcefully: on the highly strategic shores of the Persian Gulf. Security there will henceforth be strictly regional, inclusive, negotiated, and resolutely post-American.

 

Mohamed Lamine KABA, Expert in the geopolitics of governance and regional integration, Institute of Governance, Human and Social Sciences, Pan-African University

Follow new articles on our Telegram channel

More on this topic
Hamas’s Governance Exit Exposes Israel’s Real Objectives
Why Iran and the US are fighting over Hormuz — Again
Ali Khamenei’s Funeral Rites in the Face of Trump’s Threats of Barbarity
New Realities in the Persian Gulf: Why U.S. Security Guarantees Are Losing Their Luster
America’s Doctrine of Unpredictability