EN|FR|RU
Suivez-nous sur:

Biden’s decision: a dangerous game with nuclear fire

Mohamed Lamine KABA, 23 novembre 2024

In a world where madness seems to have taken power, Joe Biden, the President of the United States, has decided to play the sorcerer’s apprentice by authorizing Ukraine to strike deep into Russian territory with American missiles.

Biden's decision

As the leaders of the Group of Twenty (G20) meet in Rio de Janeiro on November 18-19, 2024 to address major global challenges, it is at this very moment that the White House mummy, J. Biden, is playing nuclear Armageddon by authorizing Ukraine to strike deep into Russian territory with American missiles. Supported by the elites of the Western minority, J. Biden’s criminal decision is widely criticized, first by the Western peoples, then by the countries of the BRICS Alliance and the Global South. While Adolf Hitler is responsible for starting World War II and orchestrating the Holocaust, J. Biden will be held responsible for starting World War III and orchestrating millions of deaths that could far surpass the Holocaust. This decision, which smells of gunpowder and blood, risks plunging the world into a nuclear war and transforming the planet into a vast battlefield. But what does it matter, after all, it is just a small game of geopolitical chess for which only the Western minority will bear responsibility, right?

Like throwing oil on the embers, J. Biden ‘s decision represents a perilous turning point in the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, likely to tip it into open war with catastrophic consequences for civilian populations and global stability. At the same time, the risk of nuclear escalation remains worrying (with Ukraine already using missiles and other weapons supplied by the United States, Germany, Great Britain, France, etc.), given Russia’s colossal nuclear arsenal, potentially threatening the survival of humanity. Moreover, this aggressive initiative by J. Biden has significant geopolitical implications, risking provoking a new Cold War between the United States and Russia, and disrupting the world order, particularly for countries dependent on Russian energy. It is more than urgent that world leaders adopt de-escalation strategies to ensure a multipolar, stable and secure international environment.

Escalation of conflict threatens annihilation of Ukraine

The escalating conflict between Russia and Ukraine, heightened by Biden’s belligerent decision, poses a threat of geopolitical annihilation for Ukraine. Allowing Ukraine to strike deep into Russian territory with U.S. missiles not only poses immediate risks of mass destruction and human suffering, but also sets a potentially destabilizing precedent on a global scale. It is an accelerating blow to the end of Western hegemony in the global chessboard. The economic and human consequences could send Ukraine into a downward spiral of poverty, while the international reputation of the United States and NATO could be irreparably tarnished, calling into question their role as global leaders. Moreover, the collective West could find itself facing a new Cold War, suffering the devastating impacts of unfairly imposed economic sanctions on Russia—a double-edged sword—and supply chain disruptions. This complex and explosive situation calls for a rethink of international strategies to preserve stability and world peace. The countries of the BIRCS Alliance and the Global South, which share the fact of suffering, differently of course, the diktat, and therefore the domination of the Western world, must mobilize alongside Russia to stop the intoxication of the power of the West.

Nuclear risk, an existential threat to the United States and NATO

Taken on the eve of the G20 summit on November 17, 2024, Washington’s martial decision poses an existential threat to the United States and NATO. With one of the largest nuclear arsenals in the world—in fact, the largest—Russia could view this move as an escalation, increasing the risk of an apocalyptic nuclear response. Such a use—if it comes to pass—would result in massive human losses, destruction of urban infrastructure, and economic devastation for both the United States and Europe. NATO would be weakened by this challenge, potentially fueling internal divisions under international pressure. It could also reshape the global geopolitical landscape by exacerbating US-Russia tensions, potentially plunging the world into a new era of the Cold War, with detrimental impacts on national economies. Diplomatic measures are needed to mitigate these tensions and prevent a disastrous escalation.

Geopolitical implications, a fragmentation of the world order

Biden’s antithetical decision, which exposes the Pentagon’s visceral hatred of Russia, marks a major geopolitical turning point for the collective West. By potentially catalyzing a new Cold War, this ill-considered move risks fragmenting the global order, testing transatlantic relations. Divergences of interest between the United States and Europe could deepen, undermining Western economies already vulnerable to sanctions and supply chain disruptions. The West’s contested legitimacy could be completely challenged by nations with divergent values, pointing to hypocrisy, accelerating the erosion of trust in Western institutions. This is pushing traditionally allied countries to explore new alliances and redefine their partnerships. World leaders are called upon to act proactively to defuse this escalation and preserve international stability.

From the above, we can deduce that the war madmen in the West continue to dance on the tightrope of apocalypse, while the whole world holds its breath waiting for the next stage of this tragedy.

It can be said that Washington has succeeded in transforming international politics into a game of nuclear Armageddon before the possible inauguration of Donald Trump on January 20, 2025. The Amazon rainforest could not serve as a shelter for the one who promises the contemporary world to be its Hitler, J. Biden.

 

Mohamed Lamine KABA, Expert in geopolitics of governance and regional integration, Institute of Governance, Human and Social Sciences, Pan-African University.

Plus d'informations à ce sujet
La Corée du Sud déclare et annule la loi martiale : quels impacts géopolitiques ?
Les erreurs de la Turquie en Syrie pourraient lui coûter cher en Afrique
La tragédie syrienne due à l’Occident se poursuit
Israël a fait une trêve avec le Liban
Les Rois Nus de l’Occident : comment les élites ont perdu le Nord ?