EN|FR|RU
Follow us on:

A Century of Extraction: Tata, Magadi and Kenya’s Ongoing Economic Decolonization

Simon Chege Ndiritu, September 07, 2026

On September 3, 2026, Kenyan President William Ruto made a momentous announcement that symbolized the end of an era of colonial legacy in the industrial sector of this African country.
Trona Extractor in Kenya

A Century-Old Trona Extractor Shown the Door

William Ruto announced that he had directed Tata Chemicals Magadi Limited to stop operations at the Magadi plant, which has operated for 100 years. The president blamed the firm for not building any social infrastructure for the local communities, a claim that is not baseless. On September 5, 2026, he clarified that his interest was to end the monopoly at Magadi, demanding that other firms must get an opportunity to build downstream industries. Meanwhile, the firm has rushed to court seeking a judicial review of the decision, while some politicians have opposed the move. On its website, Tata boasts of being Africa’s “largest soda ash manufacturer and exporter” and of “driving sustainability.” The latter claim is interesting since the surrounding African community is already experiencing an acute water shortage only a few days after Magadi halted operations. Clearly, the company only focused on making its mining of Kenyans’ Trona sustainable while making the communities’ access to water dependent on its operation. The story of Tata Chemicals in Magadi uniquely reflects the colonial extractive legacy of parties that gained colonial-era concessions covering huge tracts of land and extensive water and mineral rights, which they continue to exploit while giving minimal returns to Africans and rejecting the renegotiation of their concessions with post-independence African institutions. This paper looks into how the Kenyan government’s efforts vis-à-vis Tata Chemicals provide an opportunity for the economic liberation of African resources that can be used to drive industrialization.
As opposed to allowing colonial-era transnational corporations to profit from Africa’s resources through exports, it is time Africans facilitated the development of downstream industries

Are We Slaves to Other People?

As President Ruto lamented Tata Chemicals’ failure to build industries and social infrastructure on September 3, he proceeded to ask, “Are we slaves to other people?” — a question that is hard to dismiss for many reasons. For instance, the company has almost exclusively benefited from the land and mineral concessions it gained from the colonial government for a century. The company has mined Trona, processed it into Soda Ash, and sold it abroad while the neighboring communities have remained in abject poverty. Meanwhile, it has engineered dependency among the surrounding African community. While it claims to be providing water, healthcare, and education to the community, the said water is largely accessed only as long as it continues operating. Some local community members were already unable to access water a few days after its operations were shut, meaning that it had never thought of connecting residents to water supplies for the entire century of its operation. Similarly, while claiming to provide 75%-subsidized healthcare to residents, it also reported that residents were too poor to access the same care. Maybe community members would be richer if their land had not been conceded to some foreign firm by the colonial government in the 1920s.

The debate concerning Magadi comes at a crucial moment, especially after titanium mining operations in Kwale, Kenya, were closed in 2024 (after 10 years), when the ore was exhausted. These mining operations left no industry and brought fewer returns to the government compared to those earned by other players in the value chain. For instance, in 2022, the company involved, Base Titanium, reported $279.1 million in revenue and a net profit of $80.7 million, while Kenya earned $64.8 million in taxes and royalties. Without a policy shift, the Trona resource in Magadi, or crude oil in Uganda, among other resources, will be exhausted and leave the communities poor. In the case of titanium mining, Base Titanium earned the highest value, while other players in the value chain also extracted value that Kenya was unable to capture.

Calls for the creation of downstream industries for Trona align with the UN Trade and Development recommendation that Africa should add value to its raw materials to enhance economic development and resilience. It also foregrounds the challenges associated with resources that were conceded to foreign transnational companies by colonial governments that had no legitimacy. It is curious how Tata Chemicals, which started operations in the colonial era, retained access after independence in 1963 and also under the Constitution of Kenya 2010. There is a need for mineral resources in Magadi and other places to be awarded competitively to investors willing to work under existing laws and pursue those that are more representative of Kenyans’ interests.

Tata Chemicals has accumulated extractive inertia as a beneficiary of massive colonial land concessions from the British, making it unfit for Kenyans’ current needs. In the 1920s, the colonial government awarded eye-watering 211,104 acres at Lake Magadi and 11,678 at Lake Natron, including, rights to prospect for, extract, and carry away trona to commercial entities, plus an additional 2,200 acres for a railway lease. Tata Chemicals ended up using only a small percentage of the land and hoarding the rest. The firm should release the land back to the government and potential competitors. Were the hoarded land to be sold, leased, or used for economic activities by the county government, it would have provided sufficient money for schools, hospitals, and water supply, services that the company now uses to blackmail residents and the government. Tata Chemicals has refused to align its operations with new Kenyan laws, especially the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and the Mining Act of 2016, requiring firms exploiting Kenyans’ natural resources to share proceeds with county governments and local communities. It has also failed to create manufacturing value chains.

A Case for Downstream Manufacturing for Trona

As opposed to allowing colonial-era transnational corporations to profit from Africa’s resources through exports, it is time Africans facilitated the development of downstream industries. This move will create high-value products, provide high-paying employment, and pull Africans out of poverty. It will also provide governments with the revenue needed to provide social services. Luckily, the mineral resource in question in Magadi is a raw material for many industries. While all the Trona mined in Magadi, Kenya, may not be used in manufacturing, as much of it as possible can be used to make a wide range of glass products, such as flat glass, architectural glass, containers, and bottles. These products are consumed in large volumes in Kenya’s vibrant economy. Some of it should also be used to make soaps and detergents, chemicals for water treatment, papermaking, and metallurgy, among others. Surprisingly, Tata Chemicals did not even think of manufacturing soaps and detergents, among the simplest industrial processes that could create more value from Kenyans’ resources. However, no one should expect a beneficiary of extractive colonial concessions to think of meaningful industrialization, making it crucial to look for new players with a different mentality.

 

Simon Chege Ndiritu is a political observer and research analyst from Africa

Follow new articles on our Telegram channel

More on this topic
Reclaiming States and Value: Recapture of Kidal and Creation of Gold Refineries Across Sahel
Colonialism Did Not Die — It Changed Its Suit for New Clothes
His Excellency President of the Republic of Ghana John Dramani Mahama : “ I have no doubt that we will achieve our objectives because we are firmly united across the African world and we will never give up ”
How does the diversification of African partnerships with the East and West obstruct the continent’s development path?
Why is Italy covering up the expulsion of its ambassador to Ethiopia