When Washington’s old alliances begin to fray, Ottawa and Brussels rush to rewrite the transatlantic playbook—but beneath the rhetoric of unity lie political fault lines, economic contradictions and competing ambitions.
Their new alliance first became an idea after Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s speech at Davos, where he called for the so-called middle powers to unite, but was solidified when Ursula von der Leyen announced Canada becoming the EU’s first associate member. This week, though, the EU and Canada held a summit to hash out what this new type of alliance was going to become. The summit was overshadowed by fears of provoking both China and the US as well as anger over nomenclature at home in Europe.
Historical Perspective
The EU and Canada were already close partners, but naturally, the US has been the main partner for both of them for even longer. Canada has a long, extensive, and deep relationship with the US by virtue of their long border, while the EU has depended on the US for its security architecture and tech since World War II. However, that isn’t to say that their mutual relationship has been sidelined in the favor of the US.
In fact, the delegation of the Canadian relations is the European Parliament’s oldest delegation, and the Economic Cooperation Agreement with Canada was one of the first of its kind that the European Community, as it was called back then, ever made. In 2016, both partners signed a ‘Strategic Partnership Agreement’ (SPA) and a ‘Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement’ (CETA), which removed duties from 98% of the products. The SPA deals with security while CETA governs trade. But it hasn’t all been a walk in the park. CETA has still not been ratified in ten EU countries, while Canada has fulfilled its part of the bargain.
EU-Canada Summit 2026
On October 30, 2026, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced an “Alliance for the Future” to deepen economic and technological cooperation and counter global threats. Some EU officials have already flagged in advance that the broader framework of this new Alliance for the Future will likely be hashed out by summer 2027. Considering how slowly the EU usually moves, it shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise that two months weren’t enough to deliver bold new moves. As per the official statements, this is a new partnership revolving around three areas of priority.
A. Deepening Economic Cooperation
Economic cooperation is set to deepen significantly. Although they didn’t address the issue of CETA ratification directly, it was touched on through a new Digital Trade Agreement that would make cross-border transfer of money much easier. Additionally, negotiations have concluded on facilitating European investment in Canadian critical resources, especially minerals.
B. Increasing Security Collaboration
Security is about to become more collaborative between Canada and the EU. Canada is already one of the few countries outside of the EU to access safe loans, which offer long maturity loans to be invested in strategic and urgent defense needs. And the two collaborate on the Arctic security as well. Canada is also expected to join the EU’s Ukraine support loan, expected to total roughly 90 billion euros.
C. Extending Social Connections
Canada and the EU intend to expand the ability of young people, scientists, and skilled labor to work and live between the two partners. Canada announced its intentions to join Erasmus, and they have agreed to work towards greater mutual recognition of professional qualifications. Von der Leyen also stated that the two will begin cooperating on the highest possible levels and “most strikingly, parliament to parliament.” This could mean Canadian representatives will be allowed to attend high official meetings and committee hearings and vice versa, which hopefully will assist in smoothing out their new deepened collaboration on foreign policy.
What could derail the alliance?
The first and foremost issue is the usual EU consensus problem. Von der Leyen had neglected to inform officials on either side of the new ‘associate membership’ of Canada to the EU that she pitched in her annual State of the Union Speech, sparking backlash from French and German officials. This has apparently caused the two would-be partners to scrub the label from official statements ahead of the summit. Those who oppose this associate membership argue that the consent should have been decided before the label was announced rather than launch it first and then scramble to figure out what it would mean later.
Although this is a bit ironic considering that German Chancellor Merz himself pitched a similar idea for Ukraine just a year earlier. In spite of this, both von der Leyen and Carney continue to use the term ‘associate membership’ in public during the opening of the summit. Likewise, potential French President Marine Le Pen has already expressed a negative opinion on just CETA. So, one could imagine that she might be a wrench in future negotiations if she wins.
Furthermore, and perhaps more importantly, the two are currently pursuing industrial policies that would shut the other out. It’s unclear how the recently made in Canada policies would interact with European products and vice versa. At the same time, existing barriers hamper the relationship. Europe is ironically complaining about cumbersome Canadian food, alcohol, and makeup regulations, while Canada fears that European deforestation policies could burden their own exports.
In addition, deeper Canadian participation in European defense initiatives, in particular support for Ukraine, could reinforce Western political, economic, and security pressure on Russia, even without establishing a formal military bloc directed against it. Likewise, on one side, Canada and the EU are trying to come close and deepen their economic partnerships with China amidst the ever-increasing unpredictability and unreliability of the US. While on the other side, through such initiatives like Alliance for the Future, they are contributing to a broader Western effort to counterbalance China’s growing economic and technological influence. Last but not least, this alliance is a direct result of President Trump’s protectionist policies against US allies. The main query here is, will the US allow both the EU and its border neighbor Canada to maneuver freely, sidelining the US?
Conclusion
Fundamentally, the future form of the alliance remains unpredictable. The Alliance for the Future might be more of an effort to maintain Western dominance in a world evolving past its historical power bases than a plan for a stable international order. Moscow and Beijing are not expected to stay idle as the Western framework becomes more exclusive. After all, the future belongs not to those who merely close ranks, but to those who learn to coexist in a world where power is no longer concentrated in Western hands.
Taut Bataut is a researcher and writer who publishes on South Asian geopolitics
Follow new articles on our Telegram channel
