EN|FR|RU
Follow us on:

The Horn of Africa: Growing Escalation. Part 1

Ivan Kopytsev, October 15

The clearly visible and practically tangible escalation in tensions between Ethiopia on the one hand and Somalia and Egypt on the other calls into question the prospects for peaceful coexistence of virtually all the Horn of Africa states.

The Horn of Africa: Escalation

At various periods in history, humanity has repeatedly encountered scenarios where, in one or another region of the world, long-standing contradictions of both an intrastate and interstate nature, ignited by the spark of new ambitions and the desire to “test one’s strength,” has led to the beginning of a protracted process of escalation, including an exchange of claims and demands and subsequent “bargaining” based on saber-rattling and appeals to other instruments of direct and indirect influence on opponents. Depending on given political contexts, the determination of the authorities and the coincidence of emotional factors, such vortices of tension have sometimes led to the beginning of large-scale upheavals for the region in question, or, on the contrary, those tensions were dissipated over time thanks to the mediation of external players and the unwillingness of the parties directly involved to take excessive risks. Today, a similar dynamic has been observed over the last several months in the Horn of Africa, which has traditionally been one of the most “problematic” regions in Africa, one of the reasons being due to its geostrategic importance. However, the scale and intensity of the current confrontation exceeds earlier precedents, at least those that have taken place thus far in the 21st century.
However, the parties came very close to exchanging direct threats

A General Overview

Overall, there are two most logical starting points for the current round of escalation. In line with the broader approach, the preconditions for the confrontation we are witnessing were laid in 2020-2022 during the armed phase of the Tigray conflict—nominally an intra-Ethiopian crisis, which in practice had a colossal impact on the region-wide system of interstate relations and security. It appears that the success of Abiy Ahmed’s government in that war created favorable conditions in the Ethiopian political landscape for the consolidation of power in the hands of the federal center and its subsequent pivot to foreign policy issues. At the same time, it is also appropriate to take the position that the starting point of the “Ethiopia vs. the rest” conflict should be considered to be Abiy Ahmed’s autumn statements, which put forth claims for his country to receive direct access to the sea, and, as the first phase of the conflict, the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding between Ethiopia and the unrecognized state of Somaliland. Seen from one perspective, such a view leaves the underlying causes of the growing tension in the region in the background; alternatively, this view allows us to delve more deeply into the dynamics of events, limiting the period under study to a fairly tangible time frame.

So, after Abiy Ahmed’s statements, which received the widest international resonance, proclaiming Ethiopia’s right to direct access to the sea and offering cooperation between Addis Ababa and its neighbors in exchange for economic preferences, the information space of the region was engulfed by a real war of narratives and discourses: all of Ethiopia’s neighbors, in more or less harsh tones, expressed dissatisfaction with the Ethiopia’s position. The fact is that Eritrea, Djibouti and Somalia, being disproportionately inferior to their common neighbor in economic and military terms, are extremely wary of any possible manifestations of imperial ambitions on the part of the heir to Abyssinia, and they understand that almost any compromise on this issue will strengthen Ethiopia’s position in the region.

The second “pre-escalation” phase took place in January and February 2024: the appearance in the public space of information about the achievement of a historic agreement between Addis Ababa and Hargeisa caused a real wave of indignation on the part of the federal government of Somalia and its Egyptian partners, who, in light of the emerging opportunity to cause trouble for their increasingly powerful opponent, soon acquired the unofficial status of an “ally” of Mogadishu. In fact, at this stage, the boundaries of two opposing blocs were outlined: Ethiopia, which has the support of its “junior” partner, Somaliland, and a close alliance of Mogadishu and Cairo, indirectly supported by the government of Eritrea. However, although the parties came very close to exchanging direct threats, there was still considerable room for maneuvering: (1) the Ethiopia-Somaliland Agreement was not ratified, (2) Addis Ababa had not yet launched the procedure for officially recognizing Somaliland’s independence and (3) Somalia and Egypt had not taken steps aimed at creating the preconditions for armed escalation. A semblance of status quo was maintained until the summer of 2024: against the backdrop of the ongoing rapprochement between Mogadishu and Ankara, conditions emerged for Turkish mediation in resolving the Ethiopian-Somali disagreement due to Turkey’s interest in cooperating with both states. However, two rounds of talks in Ankara did not lead to any visible successes, and in August the conflict entered its third phase.

 

Ivan Kopytsev, a political scientist, junior research fellow at the Center for the Study of North Africa and the Horn of Africa at the Institute of African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; a research intern at the Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies at the Institute of International Relations of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, exclusively for the magazine “New Eastern Outlook

More on this topic
US-Israel Inch Toward Wider, More Dangerous War
Has Israel Become a Dangerous Loose Cannon?
Zigzags of fate—the life of a Russian national in Africa
The Great Game in the Horn of Africa continues. Part 3: Conflict between Ethiopia and Somalia -Washington as provocateur
The moral decline of the West