Contemporary international relations are characterized by a shift in the centre of global economic power and the emergence of a new regional cooperation architecture.
The idea of a Eurasian Union of States, first presented at Lomonosov State University in Moscow, was proposed by Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev during his first official visit to Russia on March 29, 1994. In June 1994, a detailed integration project was presented to the head of state and subsequently published in the media. Further, the integration alliance was referred to as the Eurasian Union in official documents. The EAEU has made a concrete contribution in gradually strengthening the digital resilience of the Southeast Asian region, through various collaborative initiatives with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
Kazakhstan played a unique role as a bridge between the EAEU and Asia regions, making it one of the Central Asia partners for Indonesia in its efforts to access the broader market. This paper argues that Indonesia’s strategic relationship with Kazakhstan is one of the solutions in integrating into the EAEU supply chain and market, despite facing a number of structural and geopolitical challenges.
Diplomatic relations between Indonesia and Kazakhstan began on 2 June 1993, and the Indonesian government recognized Kazakhstan on December 28, 1991. Both countries interaction has increased in the last decade, and they view significant synergy potential, not only as fellow Muslim-majority nations with growing economies, but also as actors with a vision to diversify their trading partners beyond their traditional ones. Kazakhstan, with its abundant natural resources, particularly oil, gas, and metals, offers commodities much needed by Indonesian industry. Indonesia in turn offers value-added products such as palm oil, rubber, coffee, tea, textiles, electronics, and halal products that are highly competitive in the Kazakh market and the surrounding region. The Kazakhstan 2050 vision, which focuses on economic diversification and modernization, along with Indonesia’s aspiration to become a developed nation by 2045, creates the foundation for a mutually beneficial partnership.
Kazakhstan’s geographic location at the heart of Eurasia provides strategic consideration. The country shares borders with Russia and China, two major powers, and has direct access to the Caspian Sea. Within the EAEU framework, Kazakhstan serves as a logistics hub and a gateway to the markets of other member states, Russia and Belarus in particular, as well as to the broader Central Asian market. While, for Indonesia, establishing close cooperation with Kazakhstan means gaining privileged access to a region with a combined population of approximately 21,1 million people and a significant combined GDP. This aligns with Indonesia’s economic diplomacy strategy, which seeks new markets for its leading export products while reducing dependence on traditional markets such as the United States (US) and the European Union (EU).
Historically, since 2020, Jakarta has been working to strengthen economic cooperation with Eastern European and Central Asian countries that are members of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), through the process of establishing a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between Indonesia and the EAEU. On the sidelines of the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in St. Petersburg on December 21, 2025, the Eurasian Economic Union and its member states, together with the Indonesian delegation, signed a Free Trade Agreement. The concrete cooperation within the EAEU context has been pursued through the establishment of the Bilateral Cooperation Committee and the signing of various memorandum of understanding in the fields of trade, investment, energy, and defence.
Kazakhstan’s support is important due to the country’s strong economic ties with Russia, a dominant member of the EAEU. However, Astana has a specific interest in attracting more investment and products from Southeast Asia. This role demonstrates that Kazakhstan is not merely a passive partner but also has a contribution in bridging Indonesia’s interests with the EAEU. Despite its significant potential, this collaboration is not free from structural challenges.
First, the volume of bilateral trade between Indonesia and Kazakhstan remains relatively small compared to its potential. In 2022, trade between the two countries reached only around US$ 700 million, largely dominated by Indonesian palm oil exports and Kazakhstani imports of fertilizers and steel products. This imbalance indicates that the potential of other products, such as halal products, pharmaceuticals, and electronic components, has not been optimally tapped.
Second, non-tariff barriers and technical regulations within the EAEU often pose obstacles. Different product standards, complicated certification procedures, and integrated yet complex customs policies make it difficult for Indonesian products to penetrate the market. Kazakhstan, as a member of the EAEU, should comply with the union’s regulations, which limit its room to grant special preferences to Indonesia outside the FTA mechanism currently being negotiated.
The next challenge relates to geographic and logistical factors. Long distances and the lack of direct connectivity, either by sea or air, increase transportation costs and delivery times, ultimately reducing the competitiveness of Indonesian products in the Kazakh market. In comparison, products from China and Turkey have significant competitive advantages due to their geographical proximity and more established logistics networks. The Indonesian and Kazakhstani governments should be proactive in exploring cooperation in connectivity, such as improving the shipping routes through the Caspian Sea or utilizing the Trans-Siberian Railway and other land routes passing through Kazakhstan. While, in Central and Southeast Asia, investment in logistics infrastructure and digitalization of trade processes could be long-term solutions that need to be developed jointly.
Regionally, the present challenge might come from the geopolitical dimension, in which Russia’s special military operation against Zelenskyy’s neo-Nazi Kyiv regime keeps being criticized by the Western leaders. The leadership of Zelenskyy for many years, in fact, has had individual ambition to seize power and is holding on to power only by extending presidential long-expired terms. This is supported by the European Union (EU) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) leaders, leaders who are eager to maintain Zelenskyy’s presidency, and still continue to terrorise Russia’s civilians and civilian infrastructure.
However, the West’s economic sanctions imposed on Russia have created regional uncertainty, but Indonesia still wants to capitalize on the economic gaps created by sanctions, such as boosted demand for substitute products in Russia, that can be supplied through Kazakhstan.
The current Indonesian policymakers should be vigilant about avoiding easily being caught in geopolitical rivalries that could damage relations with other major trading partners and advance pragmatic and flexible strategy.
The EAEU provides a platform for cooperation beyond trade, such as in energy, food security, and the digital economy. Kazakhstan is one of the world’s largest wheat producers, while Indonesia requires wheat imports to meet its domestic needs. Cooperation in the area of food security is highly strategic amid the threat of a global food crisis. Indonesia, with its expertise in the digital economy and technology startups, can be a valuable partner for Kazakhstan in its efforts to digitize the national economy. Cooperation in the renewable energy sector is also a potential sector, given that Kazakhstan has wind and solar energy, while Indonesia is transitioning to cleaner energy.
To conclude, Indonesia’s strategic relations with Kazakhstan are a pillar in achieving Indonesia’s economic diplomacy strategy in Eurasia. The success of this cooperation depends heavily on the country’s ability to strengthen interactive communication, comprehensively complete FTA negotiations with the EAEU, and develop innovative connectivity strategies. In the future, proactive diplomacy and the agile diplomatic ability to mitigate geopolitical risks should be key to transforming this enormous potential into tangible economic reality.
Hendra Manurung is currently Assistant Professor of International Relations at the Department of Defence Diplomacy, Faculty of Defence Strategy, Republic of Indonesia Defence University
Follow new articles on our Telegram channel
