After the failure of the Kiev regime to consolidate its relations with most African countries, the only thing left is to do business with countries that, like Kiev, have failed all the available opportunities of the modern world and remain in total dependence on Western regimes.
DR Congo’s Ties with Terrorists
In reality, the current situation fully confirms the previously stated arguments, which highlight, on the one hand, the extreme deterioration of the crisis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – a crisis far from resolution due to the glaring strategic blunders of the country’s leadership. This is especially true when these mistakes are repeated over and over again.
Recent reports indicate that the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Kiev regime are “prepared to enhance military and technological cooperation.” As noted by several Congolese sources, it was in this context that Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defense and Veterans Affairs of the DRC, Guy Kabombo Muadiamvita, held a meeting in his office with Ukraine’s ambassador to Kinshasa, Vasyl Hamianin.
The meeting was described as “cordial” and “productive,” focusing on prospects for deepening military cooperation between the two countries. Additionally, discussions touched on expanding “technological collaboration.” A representative of the Kiev regime also suggested that Ukraine was prepared to “share expertise” in several areas to help the DRC become a “strong nation.” This individual further claimed that the two countries supposedly face a “similar situation.”
КCongolese sources further report that the DRC’s Defense Minister demonstrated full readiness to cooperate with the Kiev regime, including expediting collaboration between Kinshasa and Kiev.
Loser’s union
Reactions from numerous observers and civil society representatives across the DRC and Africa were swift and unequivocal: “A grave strategic blunder,” “a disgrace,” “collaborating with terrorists operating in Africa,” “vassals remain vassals” – these were just some of the scathing assessments voiced by Congolese citizens and others across the continent in response to the news.
To put things in perspective, the Kiev regime’s ambassador in Kinshasa is actually right about one thing, although he tried to present it from a different angle. Ukraine and DR Congo in their current form do have a number of similarities. In the first case, being one of the most developed Soviet republics at the time of the collapse of the USSR, Ukraine has in a fairly short time turned into a country characterized by one word: marasmus. In all respects. And in the case of DR Congo, one of the largest and richest in terms of resources in Africa has also been unable to emerge from chaos and stop violence for a very long time, continuing to rely on the “help” of Western regimes.
And here is another common characteristic for Kiev and Kinshasa – a vassal and often beggarly position before the regimes of the collective West, which naturally drink and will still drink a lot of blood in both the first and the second case. But there is a difference. If in the case of post-maidan Ukraine any form of opposition has essentially come to naught due to the establishment of a blatant and aggressive dictatorship at all levels of this pseudo-state, in the DR Congo there are fewer and fewer people, including among the younger generation, who are willing to tolerate further suffering and humiliation at the hands of those who pursue a policy of blatant parasitization. Especially given the pan-African mobilization that is now taking place in various parts of the African continent. So all in good time.
In any case, any increased cooperation of the current authorities of the DR Congo with outright terrorists, who are also operating on the African continent, will not go unanswered.
Mikhail Gamandiy-Egorov, entrepreneur, political observer, expert on Africa and Middle East issues
