The rampant witch hunt that was so carelessly started a couple of years ago has now evolved in a weapon of choice for competing political and financial factions in Washington. Yes, we’re speaking about the allegations of Russia’s presidential election meddling that the MSM has been discussing for months, in complete disregard of the fact that not a single piece of evidence supporting those allegations has been shown to the general public. As for those attempts that some politicians take to return the US political system back to civilized ways, that ship has pretty much sailed.
As the Mueller investigation starts putting its cards on the table, it’s clear that Donald Trump has a chance of not staying in office long enough to get reelected. But it is still a very long way from these documents to the president’s door, and the journey is likely to be perilous for all involved. The danger to Trump is obvious: that prosecutors will tie him to offenses serious enough to warrant impeachment — and that the Democrats who will take control of the House in January will quickly oblige. Even if Trump manages to hold on to enough Republican votes in the Senate to avoid being removed from office, the process is likely to be humiliating.
Of course, nobody is willing to discuss the fact the witch hunt came at a price of 30 thousand dollars to American taxpayers. As it has recently been specified by Donald Trump himself:
After two years and millions of pages of documents , no collusion!
In turn, the US justice department would release its own evaluation of the price Americans paid for an attempt to pinpoint instances of Russian interference in the presidential election. The civil body itself, along with the team of special prosecutor Robert Muller, spent a total of 8.5 million dollars in the period from April to September. With the Mueller team accounting for 4.6 million dollars, and the justice department taking its share of 3.9 million over the same period of time.
However, Russia’s meddling at this point is more of a urban legend than anything else, yet the investigation has managed to uncover traces of Israeli and Saudi meddling that is going to be evaluated independently. And, if the Daily Beast is to be believed, in the nearest future the Mueller team will release new details.
It’s curious that while one part of the Mueller team has indicted Russia, another cadre has been spending its time focusing on how Middle Eastern countries pumped cash in Washington in an attempt to sway policy under President Trump’s administration. Various witnesses affiliated with the Trump campaign have been questioned about their conversations with deeply connected individuals from the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia.
It has also been revealed that the crown princes of both Saudi Arabia and the UAE were eager to help Trump win the election. It is now known that Joel Zamel was equally eager to lend his services, a man with deep ties to Israeli intelligence was in close contact with the Trump team because one of his companies, Psy Group, had drawn up a plan to use social-media manipulation to help Trump clinch the Republican nomination. The company sent former senior campaign aide Rick Gates that proposal.
However, against the background of the massive campaign aimed at identifying those actually responsible for the interfering in democratic process of the United States, one can’t help but to be completely puzzled by the reluctance of the Muller team to reveal the role that Israel played in this matter.
However, the British Independent would cite the words of the world-renowned veteran activist Noam Chomsky, who accused Israel of “brazenly” interfering in US electoral politics in a way that vastly outweighs any efforts that may have been carried out by Russia.
In the above mentioned article it has been revealed that Netanyahu has the capacity of going directly to Congress, without even informing the president, and speaking to it whenever it sees fit, thus undermining the president’s policies. Noam Chomsky would be spot on in demanding:
Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress, calling on them to reverse US policy, without even informing the president? And that’s just a tiny bit of this overwhelming influence. So if you happen to be interested in instances of foreign influence on US elections, there are places to look.
The New York Times would publish a very convincing article about the role that Israel played in the recent American election. Other media sources have also thoroughly studied the way in which Israel controls the United States, exploiting both the spineless Congress and the White House.
But Israel didn’t try to approach the matter directly through its lobbyists or the well-known influential American-Israeli Public Relations Committee (AIPAC), which has spent well over 1.75 million dollars this year alone on the promotion of pro-Israel policies in the United States.
Instead, Israel would take advantage of the influence it has over today’s neo-Nazi Ukraine. It’s hardly a secret that Ukrainian officials tried to influence the US presidential election by making attempts to assist Hillary Clinton through unearthing unpleasant facts about her rival – Donald Trump. The Politico has also made a number of fair points on this too.
Unsurprisingly, with so many facts on its hands the White House chose to accuse Ukrainian authorities of interfering in the US election last year. On his Twitter, Donald Trump called for a comprehensive investigation of Ukraine’s role in the support of Hillary Clinton during the American election campaign. He wrote:
Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump campaign – “quietly working to boost Clinton.” So where is the investigation Attorney General.
Curious enough, he addressed this tweet to the Fox News presenter Sean Hanniti, who was bold enough to mention Politico’s take on Kiev’s attempts to influence the American election on air.
It’s clear that the fact that Ukrainian politicians paid Paul Manafort on top of a number of other political figures across the US, using their Cyprus offshore accounts, did not receive a due consideration among analysts.
Of course, Israel is unlikely to allow Washington to conduct a similar investigation against Ukraine, which it has taken over a long time ago , with the assistance of the United States. Just take a look at the number of today’s Ukrainian politicians that have direct links to Israel.
Take, for example, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. We know from the media sources that his real name is Valtzman, the name that goes back to a Yiddish verb that entered German – walzen, which means to grind, crush into powder.
Volodymyr Groysman, the speaker of the Ukrainian parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, has Jewish ancestors just as well.
Arseniy Yatsenyuk, the former Prime Minister of Ukraine happens to be extremely proud of his mother, who’s maiden name was Bakaj, as she belongs to an ancient Jewish family that went down in history thanks to the most authoritative interpreter of the Talmud, Rabbi Bakaj.
Borys Lozhkin is the head of the presidential administration of Ukraine. It is curious that he himself told the media that he received a proposal to replace Poroshenko during his trip to Israel. He has also confined to the media he was allowed to train with special forces operatives during his stay there. According to the statements of Borys Lozhkin, Ukraine should turn into an analogue of Israel in Eastern Europe. And the list goes on…
So who hijacked the recent presidential election in America? And wasn’t Robbert Muller ordered by the behind-the-scenes puppeteers to draw the attention of the general public from the fact that the US is being controlled from another state by launching an investigation on Russia’s alleged meddling?
Grete Mautner is an independent researcher and journalist from Germany, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”
